Latex Lesbos Full Review
You know how certain things in life go together better than others? Like peanut butter and jelly. Like sun and sand. Like a burger and fries. Like dick and pussy. Well, believe it or not, there's no better combination than the combination of both latex and lesbians. The exclusive content at LatexLesbos.com is proof of this too. Unfortunately, there's not a whole lot of proof, but enough proof to make it worth your while to join. In other words, there's not a whole lot of content inside, but the content there is impressive. Very arousing. The women are beautiful. The action is over the top. The videos are lengthy. As far as the action goes, there's very little to gripe about. However, the design of the site and the video quality are different stories. Navigating the site and browsing the content are not made easy. Logging in directs members to a network homepage where LesboLatex.com is called a channel instead of a site. Clicking on the "channel" directs members to the site's homepage, which contains the same navigation menu, some tags, the most popular scenes, and then the content arranged by update across several pages. I didn't like that each page had the top watched content at the top. It was annoying more than anything. I do like that the scenes are encoded in flash that looks good and buffers quickly. The downloadable videos aren't as impressive. The downloadable scenes are only encoded in two file formats at one bit rate each. The AVI files give way to a little less than DVD quality. The WMV files are even lower quality than the AVI files. The menu along the top is the most confusing part of the site. When you're looking at LatexLesbos.com the "channel" tab is highlighted with several browsing options in place. Clicking on any of them switches you to a different tab with all kinds of content unrelated to lesbians in latex. In other words, members are taken away from the site and presented with the network content.
|
 |
- Arousing exclusive content.
- Flash video available.
- Network access.
|
- Small archive of content.
- Confusing site design.
- Low quality content.
|
I enjoyed the content of this site a lot, even though there's not a lot of it. The site itself was frustrating. I also wish that the content quality was better.
|
|  |
|